While getting coordinates for Wachmann's variables in SA 98 [vsnet-id 41], I noticed that the position of the dwarf nova CW Mon in the Downes et al. 1997 catalogue differs slightly from that of the USNO-A2.0. Further checking shows that the AC2000 star catalogue has an observation of the star evidently in outburst at mag. 12, versus mag. 16 in USNO-A. A mag. 16 star would not have been recorded on the Astrographic Catalogue plates. Perhaps this is another case similar to CG CMa. It wouldn't surprise me that the mag. 16 star was a companion to the CV, and that it is much fainter in quiescence. But the AC2000 position in what seems to be an outburst state should be shifted in position relative to the A2.0 location if the true CV lies some small distance away. As with CG CMa, astrometry needs to be obtained during a new outburst. Both the POSS-I prints and the POSS-II IIIa-F film show the mag. 16 star to be single as best I can tell. The Downes et al. and star-catalogue positions are shown below for reference. CW Mon source RA (2000) Dec DWS97 6 36 54.53 +00 02 16.3 USNO-A2.0 6 36 54.55 +00 02 17.7 AC2000 6 36 54.47 +00 02 17.4 \Brian