[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 1356] Re: Graham E-region standards
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 21:09:42 -0700
- To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: aah@nofs.navy.mil
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 1356] Re: Graham E-region standards
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Berto Monard asked about transformations from (V-R) to visual magnitudes. I did some
calculations awhile back for Janet Mattei using the CIE response curves for photopic
(bright adapted eye) and scotopic (dark adapted eye) eyes, along with Johnson/Cousins
curves and the Gunn-Stryker spectrophotometric atlas. The results were:
P = V -0.001 -0.066(B-V) = V -0.010 -0.073(V-R)
S = V -0.006 +0.382(B-V) = V +0.031 +0.448(V-R)
These relations are reasonably good for colors < 1.5.
Whose eyes are scotopic and whose are photopic? Beats me, and I certainly don't want
to get into any arguments -- I'm not any kind of expert here. The normally quoted
transformation is v = V +0.2(B-V), which falls inbetween these relations. The main
point is that (B-V) and (V-R) both give similar transformations, and so both should
be ok for determining visual magnitudes from photometric magnitudes/colors. The (V-R)
fit is somewhat worse since you are extrapolating to the bluer visual magnitudes (especially
the bluer dark adapted eye) rather than bracketing them, but R is certainly easier to
measure with most amateur CCDs than is B.
Arne
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp