[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 1347] [AAVSO-DIS] Re: Graham E-region standards
- Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 09:15:37 +0200
- To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, bas@lowell.edu, aavso-discussion@physics.mcmaster.ca, astroman@voyager.co.nz
- From: Berto Monard <lagmonar@csir.co.za>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 1347] [AAVSO-DIS] Re: Graham E-region standards
- Disclaimer: The CSIR exercises no editorial control over E-mail messages originating in the organisation and the views in this message are therefore not necessarily those of the CSIR and/or its employees.
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Dear all,
With the response properties of CCDs as they are, V-R photometry is
certainly the way to go especially with small sized telescopes. I also
believe that R measures (as compared to B) are less affected by
atmospheric effects.
But since the sensitivity of a dark adapted eye falls in between V and
B (except for Japan maybe...), how do we convert V&R measures to
visual sequences?
Perhaps we can give some attention to this in anticipation...
Regards,
Berto
>>> "William S G Walker" <astroman@voyager.co.nz> 10/02 12:52 AM >>>
Brian and all,
skip...skip
With the ST6 LX10 setup you don't have the luxury of a field eyepiece
for
exact positioning and must rely on the finder. As well, the B response
is
rather poor at
magnitude 13 so we're using V-R to calibrate things. All of this takes
a
little time to get used to hence the delays in production. But Bruce
Sumner
and I are hoping to get a number of fields down to V = 16 in the not
too
distant future.
So what I'm saying is that some slow progress is being made. Within a
few
months we hope to be producing a respectable number of results for
visual
observers. And if anyone knows of anything useful a note would be
appreciated. Did Graham or anyone do a similar job on the F Regions?
Regards,
Stan
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp