Star-catalogue folks, I realized in the last few days that Graham's E-region standard stars (1982PASP...94..244G) ware not available in machine-readable form from the data centers. I have compiled the data for the 102 stars, a sample of which is is shown below, and give in addition accurate coordinates for the stars. The coordinates are not simply those of Graham precessed to equinox 2000, but obtained mostly from the GSC and USNO-A1.0 if they are not in some astrometric catalogue. Graham's positions turn out to have numerous errors and well as being inaccurate because of the use of the Harvard Annals x,y coordinates in their derivation. Because they are very useful for analyzing and weighting photometric reductions, I have included the internal errors (mean errors of the mean) and number of observations made by Graham. Thus each line is about 113 columns wide. The complete file (just 12Kb) is copied out to the Lowell ftp area at: http://ftp.lowell.edu/pub/bas/starcats/graham.stds \Brian Name RA (2000) Dec V U-B B-V V-R R-I sigV sigUB sigBV sigVR sigRI n [CS62] E1 41 1 24 41.9 -44 31 42 6.270 1.084 1.146 0.577 0.517 0.003 0.006 0.002 0.001 0.004 5 [CS62] E1 35 1 22 02.2 -44 25 30 9.471 1.679 1.427 0.777 0.722 0.007 0.008 0.005 0.005 0.005 6 [CS62] E1 20 1 23 16.4 -44 40 18 9.855 0.275 0.736 0.402 0.387 0.008 0.009 0.008 0.004 0.005 5 [CS62] E1 44 1 24 12.3 -44 27 01 10.885 0.146 0.620 0.359 0.334 0.013 0.014 0.012 0.005 0.014 4 [CS62] E1 49 1 24 57.6 -44 38 27 11.640 0.019 0.564 0.332 0.327 0.017 0.009 0.013 0.010 0.014 4 [CS62] E1 a 1 25 19.5 -44 27 02 12.666 0.020 0.615 0.341 0.335 0.010 0.012 0.007 0.005 0.005 4 [CS62] E1 h 1 24 40.0 -44 33 55 13.828 0.235 0.722 0.375 0.373 0.010 0.010 0.011 0.011 0.014 4 [CS62] E1 i 1 24 48.1 -44 38 31 13.759 0.614 0.916 0.514 0.446 0.008 0.017 0.005 0.007 0.013 4 [CS62] E1 p 1 24 04.6 -44 23 42 14.778 0.383 0.799 0.475 0.461 0.009 0.017 0.006 0.006 0.012 4