[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 1299] Re: CK Cyg
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 17:59:07 +0900 (JST)
- To: samus@sai.msu.su, vsnet-chat
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 1299] Re: CK Cyg
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: CK Cyg
Dear Prof. Samus,
> I have checked the original publications. Really, Seliwanow's paper
> (range of pages: 343-351) contains the finding chart, correctly
> referred to in the GCVS. Moreover, it contains original
> observations, from which, formally speaking, it follows that we
> should change the GCVS epoch of maximum (taken from K.A. Tsarevich's
> light elements - note that Seliwanow's spelling of the discoverer's
> name is Zarewitsch, it is just the German version of the same name)
> into 22586(1920). I have NOT been able to locate the Mirovedenie Bull.
> referred to in my previous message.
Thank you veru much for the information. I have obtained this article.
The position indicated by the chart seems to more close to the following
USNO star, than represented by the catalog coordinates.
USNO1425.10198083 195334.798 +565907.92 (2000.0) 16.8 18.1
The photometry log may be of interest to readers:
JD mpg
2420023 12.80
0038 12.60
1140 12.50
2586 12.04
2588 12.13
2602 12.30
2604 12.61
2613 12.67
2617 13.22
3531 <14.5
Neither IRAS nor other catalog coincidence; what would be the nature of
this object?
Downes et al. (1997) adds no special information.
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp