[vsnet-chat 1038] Re: (fwd) UV Per sequence question (Schmeer)

[bas@lowell.Lowell.Edu (Brian Skiff)]

     I verified the AAVSO sequence a couple of years ago, and found that
the Misselt V values are evidently about 0.12 mag. too faint compared to
both my and Stanton's (AAVSO) values.  Also the BAA sequence by Howarth and
Bailey is just plain wrong, their V values being half a magnitude in error.
My original post is available at:

http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet/msg00267.html

     Most of Arne Henden's sequences are available from the Strasbourg 
VizieR Web utility or from their regular catalogue server.  You can get
the data for UV Per starting at:

http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/Cat?J/PASP/107/324

Use the ftp address shown in the header here to download the whole files,
or use the VizieR to view specific items.
     Finally, Kato-san prepared a V-band chart of the field using my sequence
to set the zero-point:

http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet/msg00886.html

This could perhaps be redone slightly better using Henden's data.

\Brian

VSNET Home Page

Return to Daisaku Nogami

---

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp