On Haseda's new variable star and V893 Sco N. Samus, the editor of the GCVS, has kindly provided the following comments. I have forwarded the notes to the discoverer, Haseda. Though any possible identifications looks pretty premature, follow-up observations and type classification of Haseda's variable is still very encouraged. Regards, Taichi Kato ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From samus@sai.msu.su Mon Mar 16 15:14 JST 1998 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 09:13:16 +0300 From: "Nikolai N. Samus" <samus@sai.msu.su> To: tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: on Haseda's variable star query Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1095 Dear Dr. Kato, I am afraid I don't have too much. Satyvoldiev's charts are usually very bad, and many positions published by him are greatly in error. Soon after 1972, Dr. Goranskij instructed Satyvoldiev to send us only PHOTOGRAPHIC charts, even of bad quality, for us to be able at least to guess about the identification. This rule was not strictly followed by Satyvoldiev, and at the time of Astron.Tsirk. No. 711 the rule had not existed yet! In our files, there is a remark to Astron.Tsirk. No. 711 made by me around 1983: "Cannot find the star using the chart". There are also references to Perem. Zvezdy, 1975, 20, 161;Perem. Zvezdy Prilozh., 1975, 2, No. 10, 221; ibid., 1982, 4, No. 20, 127, 1982, containing studies, always with Satyvoldiev's coauthorship. The object is listed in PASP, 1993, 105, 127. A message from R. Webbink (June, 1996) says the star is impossible to find using the chart, so the position can be in great error. What I am going to do right now is to compare the finding chart with the field of the new variable - is there any resemblance? Best wishes Nikolai From samus@sai.msu.su Mon Mar 16 16:06 JST 1998 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 10:05:46 +0300 From: "Nikolai N. Samus" <samus@sai.msu.su> To: tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp Subject: V893 Sco? Content-Type: text Content-Length: 528 Dear Dr. Kato, I have compared the star field at the coordinates of the new variable with the only published finding chart for V893 Sco. I see nothing in common - unless WEST is on top of the finding chart (not unthinkable for Satyvoldiev's charts), in which case I see something resembling the field, but seriously distorted, in the chart. We have a lady with great experience with Satyvoldiev's charts. I'd like to consult her before coming to a decision. Unfortunately I'll not see her until tomorrow. Best regards Nikolai