[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 463] Re: V1974 Cyg and CP Pup progenitors - answer to Taichi Kato
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 11:14:59 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 463] Re: V1974 Cyg and CP Pup progenitors - answer to Taichi Kato
- Cc: alon@wise.tau.ac.il
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Dear Dr. Retter,
> I'm scanning now the literature of CP Pup and V603 Aql. There are so
> many papers! I would be very happy to learn more about your note on CP
> Pup. I naively thought that since it erupted in 1942 - before the
> Palomar Sky Survey, there are no preoutburst plate(s). I might be
> wrong, and we can check the pre-nova mag. of CP Pup. That would be
> intersting and very important for our prediction for the fate of V1974
> Cyg.
According to Warner's "Cataclysmic Variable Stars", CP Pup was reported
to be fainter than mag 17 before eruption (Gaposchkin 1946 = Harv. Coll.
Obs. Bull. No. 918). It would be interesting to check this source reference
(missing here!).
Warner also lists pre- and post-eruption magnitudes of three very fast
novae. From his Table 4.5:
Porb mv(max) mv(pre) mv(post)
GQ Mus 1.43 hr 7 >21 17.5
CP Pup 1.47 0.2 >17 15.0
V1500 Cyg 3.35 1.8 >21 17.2
I think RW UMi is another example of novae which stick in brighter
post-eruption magnitudes than pre-eruption ones.
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp