I mostly agree with Dr. Skiff particularly in that the contributions of active, reliable amateurs should be known and recognized among professionals (this is one of reasons why we started vsnet), and that there is a good way for amateurs to publish their own results. However, my feeling is that the problem is not that professionals have paid too little attention to amateur works, nor there have been no practical ways of publishing. It seems to me what amateurs find comfortable or satisfactory is slightly different from what prefessionals do. Many amateurs seem to be unsatisfied with the customs of scientific publications, in which authors are usually requested to complete a job from the beginning to the end. They seem to rather wish their discovery reports or observations "used" by professionals, and wish professionals to digest and scientifically interpret the importance of their discoveries or observations. This process works well in usual variable star observing, for which many specialized organizations can handle them properly. The solar system objects, discoveries of novae and supernovae are also lucky because there is a well-established way of amateur's contribution to science. The case does not seem to be that for discovering variable stars, nor timely following-up important stellar events (as a matter of fact, those important prediscovery observations of Sakurai's object still have no chance to be published). This situation may be, however, unique to Japan, where amateur hunters have been traditionally requested by professionals not to disseminate their discovery reports by their own judgements, but to consult some agent (Tokyo Astronomical Observatory formally took this position). Considering how the VSOLJ bulletin is functioning, it looks difficult to change the present situation merely by reviewing or adding options to the current ways of publication. Probably Kiyota-san could play a role in conveying what are requested to both amateur and professional sides. I also look forward to hearing from world-wide amateurs on their thoughts. I remember I was once consulted by T. Vanmunster on future media of publication or circulation of excellent works of VVS Belgium -- probably he could also comment on his motivation. Regards, Taichi Kato