[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

[vsnet-campaign 1380] Re: [vsnet-alert 7680] IGR J17464-3213 = XTE J17464-3213:request for IR observations



Nothing at that position was detected on an image of IGR J17464-3213
taken by the unfiltered CCD camera at the Bronberg Observatory around
April 06.00 UT.

Regards,

Berto Monard

>>> Michael Rupen <mrupen@aoc.nrao.edu> 04/05/03 12:16AM >>>

We just submitted this as ATel 139.  This source may currently be
11-13th
mag. in the near IR, although the probable extinction rules out
optical
observations; it may also be highly variable, though that's far from
clear
at the moment.  Have a look if you can -- this is turning into a very
interesting source!

  Clear skies,

             Michael Rupen
             NRAO/Socorro
             mrupen@nrao.edu 

================================================================================

IGR J17464-3213 = XTE J17464-3213: Request for IR Observations

ATEL # 139: M.P. Rupen, A.J. Mioduszewski, and V. Dhawan (NRAO)
             on 4 Apr 2003; 21:08 UT
Distributed as an Instant Email Notice (Request for Observations)
Password Certification: Michael P. Rupen (mrupen@nrao.edu) 

We report further radio observations of the X-ray transient and black
hole 
candidate IGR J17464-3213 = XTE J17464-3213 (ATEL #132; ATEL #133; IAUC
8105)
from the Very Large Array (VLA). The source continues to brighten, and
appears
now to be doubling in flux density every two days. Observations on 4
April 
2003 UT give flux densities of 20.0+/-0.2 mJy at 4.9 GHz, and
22.1+/-0.2 mJy 
at 8.5 GHz. The radio spectrum has remained remarkably constant at
nu^+0.2, 
characteristic of optically-thick synchrotron emission. 

If this spectrum continues into the near infrared, as expected in some
jet 
models (e.g. Markoff et al. 2003 A&A 397, 645), the K band magnitude
would be 
between 9th and 11th. Even with 2-3 magnitudes of K band extinction
(based on 
the X-ray absorption column density, ATEL #133), this should be easily

detectable. Even upper limits would be very useful indeed, in
constraining 
these models, and in showing whether there is a chance that some of the
X-ray 
emission is synchrotron. 

Such associated infrared emission has already been observed in some
sources 
(e.g., GRS 1915+105, Fender & Pooley 1998, MNRAS 300, 573; GX 339-4,
Corbel &
Fender 2002, ApJL 573, L35), but never before in combination with such
a
stable and slow flux increase. One expects rapid variations, simply
because 
the size of the emitting region is so small, if the flat spectrum is
due to 
synchrotron self-absorption. Simple calculations give sizes of order or
less 
than a few tenths of a milliarcsecond; this corresponds to a few 10s of

light-minutes at the distance of the Galactic center, so one might hope
to 
see significant variations in some 10s of minutes in the near IR. 

We therefore urgently request infrared observations of this source, as
soon as 
possible. The radio spectrum has held steady for about a week, and the
flux 
density seems only to increase, but this is unlikely to continue for
long. 

The best position so far (from the VLA, IAUC 8105) is 
       17 46 15.61 +/- 0.01s -32 13 59.9 +/- 1" (J2000)
(we have a heavily elongated NS beam). This will improve when we have a
chance 
to look more carefully at the data. 

================================================================================

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Mailscanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.


Return to Home Page

Return to the Powerful Daisaku Nogami

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Powered by ooruri technology