IX Dra superoutburst Ishioka-san wrote in [vsnet-alert 5810] and [vsnet-campaign 851]: > We are observing IX Dra now. It seems to be about 15 mag. > Further observations are encouraged. The data very clearly show superhumps! The present outburst is thus confirmed to be a genuine superoutburst. The preliminary period determined from these data is 0.068 d. More detailed analysis will be presented by Ishioka-san later. Combined with previous observations and our earlier data, the observations seem to confirm our previous suggestion as a new ER UMa star (vsnet-alert 5370) or a closely related system. [vsnet-alert 5370] > IX Dra: new ER UMa star? > > As reported by Tonny Vanmunster, IX Dra is now confirmed as an SU UMa > type dwarf nova. As reported by Timo Kinnunen, the September outburst > lasted at least for four days, which might suggest another superoutburst. > If the September outburst was a genuine superoutburst, the interval of > subsequent superoutbursts becomes as short as 49 d, which is pretty close > to that of ER UMa! Continued monitoring for future outbursts, as well as > deep monitoring for faint (normal) outbursts are strongly encouraged. > There are only four currently known (hydrogen-rich) ER UMa stars: > ER UMa, V1159 Ori, RZ LMi and DI UMa. > > YYYYMMDD(UT) mag observer > 20000913.830 <150 (T. Kinnunen) > 20000914.880 150 (T. Kinnunen) > 20000915.790 151 (T. Kinnunen) > 20000916.850 153 (T. Kinnunen) > 20000917.810 156 (T. Kinnunen) > 20000917.973 <150 (M. Reszelski) > > 20001101.881 <153 (M. Reszelski) > 20001102.796 147 (M. Reszelski) > 20001103.717 149 (M. Reszelski) > 20001105.756 153: (M. Reszelski) > > Regards, > Taichi Kato As suggested by Ishioka-san, observations at this and following epochs are crucial and we encourage intensive observations. The data may be either sent to Ishioka-san (ishioka@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp) or directly to vsnet-campaign-data. Rehatds, VSNET Collaboration team