[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

[vsnet-campaign-deltavel 17] delta vel

Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 11:55:25 +0200
To: <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, Sebasti若n Otero <varsao@fullzero.com.ar>
From: "Brian Fraser" <fraserb@intekom.co.za>
Subject: [vsnet-campaign-deltavel 17] delta vel
Cc: "Paul Fieseler" <fieseler@mail1.jpl.nasa.gov>, "Chris Lloyd" <cl@astro1.bnsc.rl.ac.uk>, "Jan Hers" <janhers@pixie.co.za>, "Danie Overbeek" <danieo@global.co.za>, "Albert Jansen" <agjansen@Cybertrade.co.za>, <vsnet-campaign-deltavel@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
References: <011201c0461d$2a76d280$ecd7fea9@s8y0g5>
Sender: owner-vsnet-campaign-deltavel@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Last night's photometry on delta Vel -
20001104.9479    2.01V    Brian Fraser

I agree with previous suggestion that this star may be showing some
variablity.  Or else the given brightest of 1.95 is slightly wrong. If so,
how did that come about?  Can we not believe anything we get from catalogs?
cheers
Brian

VSNET Home Page

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Prev by Message: [vsnet-campaign-deltavel 16] Other possibilities for delta Velorum
Next by Message: [vsnet-campaign-deltavel 18] Delta Vel recent observations
Prev by thread: [vsnet-campaign-deltavel 16] Other possibilities for delta Velorum
Next by thread: [vsnet-campaign-deltavel 18] Delta Vel recent observations
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread