Delta Scorpii is very bright. Yesterday I had the chance to observe it during several hours and I estimated a 0.02 variation between 1.69 and 1.71. I thought it was probably spurious but it turned out that when I search for the period of the BCPE star lambda Scorpii I used for comparison, it was incredible there: The 1.69 took place when lambda is at its dimmest and the 1.71 when it is at its brightest. Since I used a mean value of 1.62 for lambda Scorpii, the actual value for delta Scorpii is 1.70. Lambda Sco's amplitude is variable, usually less than 0.05 magnitudes. Full range is 1.59 - 1.65. Ephemeris agreed with observations (JD 2452049.41 + 0.2136966 xE) I was surprised by these results. But it only confirms that with a sequence like this (0.1 or 0.2 mag. difference between comparisons; similar colors) we can be very accurate. Regarding the use of variable stars for comparisons: when the variations are this small, visually there is no problem, since using any other star besides lambda Scorpii would mean getting poor results, since essentially there is no other bright star in the area. About delta Scorpii: it is actually very bright. Standstills reported recently may be due to lamda's activity so I have made corrections to my recent observations. This is the new table that shows exactly what nust be expected!! JD / Past data / New data 2452028.781 / 1.77 / 1.77 2452034.678 / 1.76 / 1.76 2452039.639 / 1.76: / 1.76: 2452041.624 / 1.74 / 1.75 2452042.669 / 1.75 / 1.75 2452047.642 / 1.73: / 1.73: 2452048.581 / 1.73 / 1.72 2452049.679 1.70 Corrections will be sent to vsnet-obs. Best regards, Sebastian Otero --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://vsnet.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.249 / Virus Database: 122 - Release Date: 13/04/01