Sebasti疣, Bravo! It is exactly the kind of accurate visual photometry you have been doing that can detect the small changes in luminosity to make a major contribution to the study of these relatively small amplitude blue stars. I don't know what your techniques are, but you can read my posting about Theta CrB this morning about how I do it and compare our methods. When our CCD camera comes on line, I will be focusing on photometry of fainter Be stars; CCD photometry on bright stars is not easy to do, and I'm not sure how I will do that yet (I have a few ideas). The importance of "precise" amateur visual observations of bright stars, such as the Be-stars and other blue variables, can't be stressed enough. Techniques which can result in higher precision observations are possible, and I think that close to an order of magnitude improvement in the precision of visual observations is possible. It will be very interesting to see if the approx. 75-day period you've tentatively identified in the photometry can be refined, and how the luminosity changes correlate with the spectroscopic and radial velocity observations. I will be posting something later today about a possible northern "relative" of Beta Scorpii, V380 Cep (HD 200775), which is predicted to reach a maximum H-alpha high state this month or next and both PEP and precise visual estimates are very desperately needed. This is potentially a very important star in establishing the binarity of Herbig Ae/Be stars (perhaps applicable to "classical" Be stars as well). Congratulations! Cordially, Thom Gandet Sebastian Otero wrote: > > Thom Gandet wrote: > > >>Delta Sco, considering its spectral type, its past spectroscopic > behavior and its recent photometric behavior, may be a Herbig Be > star rather than a classical Be star. The prior lack of convincing > evidence for a spectroscopic period ought to be re-examined, as the > recent photometry by Sebastian and others (IBVS 5026) does show > evidence for a period near 80-days. However, it is difficult to > measure radial velocities of Be stars that are meaningful in terms > of Keplerian motion because of effects by gas streams, decretion/ > accretion disk activity, etc. > > Dear friends: > Tonight I observed delta Scorpii and Thom's words seem to > ring true. > The star is rising again and the activity is always in agreement with a 72 - > 77 day period, slightly shorter than proposed by Thom. > I supposed the star was going to fade at last, but the > fading stopped near JD 2452015 that is exactly 3 cycles of 73 days later > than the first well-observed 2.15 minimum. The star has brightened by 0.05 > magnitudes and it is very interesting to take a look at the following table > with maxima and minima. (JD's are approximated [little gaps in the data] but > they can't be off by more than 5 days) > > FIRST CYCLE: > > Maximum 1.91 - JD 2451752 > Minimum 2.15 - JD 2451793 > > SECOND CYCLE: > > Maximum 1.85 - JD 2451824 > Minimum ?? > > THIRD CYCLE: The star was not visible !! > > FOURTH CYCLE: > > Maximum 1.80 - JD 2451978 > Minimum 1.85 - JD 2452015 > > Tonight's observation is 1.81 again, and this means that the star will > probably be VERY bright in a 20-25 days time. (maybe 1.7?). > > I really don't know if there is a companion in a 75 day orbit inducing light > changes but the changes are there. Maybe with another cycle going on as > predicted, more can be said... > > In 25 days we'll have another clue. > > Best regards, > Sebastian Otero, > LIADA. > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://vsnet.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.249 / Virus Database: 122 - Release Date: 13/04/01 -- ************************************************************************ Lizard Hollow Observatory Thomas L. Gandet, Director PO Box 77021 Tucson, AZ 85703-7021 USA ************************************************************************