V359 Cen: system analogous to EF Peg or V725 Aql? Up to now, only superoutbursts have been detected with a mean interval of ~1 year. Although this might be resulted from the difficulty in detecting fainter normal outbursts, the apparent lack of normal outbursts may be a result of a low mass-transfer rate. This possibility may explain the long persistence of the signal following the superoutburst (now unambiguously identified!) in 1999 (Woudt et al. (2001) MNRAS 328, 159), which had a period close to what it presently observed. Only a few systems (WZ Sge being the best example) are known to show such a long persistence of the "late superhump" signal. Systems with similar outbursts and orbital parameters include EF Peg and V725 Aql, both of which show unusually infrequent outbursts for their superhump period. [References: EF Peg: Kato (2002) PASJ 54, 87; V725 Aql: Uemura et al. (2001) PASJ 53, 539]. Both stars have (at least on one occasion) shown virtually zero period changes in contrast to the "textbook" negative period derivatives in ordinally SU UMa-type dwarf novae. Further observations of superhumps in V359 Cen throughout the current superoutburst are therefore urgently requested to determine the period derivative; accurate measurement of times of superhump maxima (at least once per night) is a very recommended protocol. V359 Cen may show a rebrightening, as was observed in V725 Aql. Nightly monitoring following the present superoutburst is also highly encouraged. Regards, Taichi Kato VSNET Collaboration team