Hi Tonny et al, Observations here in Kaitaia more or less confirmed what you said. I ran from 22 August 0706 UT to about 1110 UT when cloud suddenly arrived. The humps were ~0.05 at around phase 0.4. Two eclipses were visible, the third was a little distorted. Overall, the star fell by about 0.12 in 4 hours. I used a 10 second exposure time but should have stuck with the 20 seconds I've been using lately. The S/N ratio might have been better. The weather doesn't look promising at the moment but let's hope. Regards, Stan ----- Original Message ----- From: <tonny.vanmunster@wanadoo.be> To: <vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>; <vsnet-campaign@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>; <vsnet-superoutburst@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Cc: <news@cba.phys.columbia.edu> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:48 PM Subject: WZ Sge results of August 21/22 run at CBA Belgium > Dear colleagues, > > I have just uploaded the August 21/22 light curve of WZ > Sge, that I obtained at CBA Belgium Observatory, to my > web site (see address below). > > It was not a particularly favourable photometric night, > hampered also by low clouds. I nevertheless managed to > collect a dense time-series, over a period of about 6 > hours. The resulting light curve clearly shows a number > of interesting features. First, the rebrightening of WZ > Sge, which was still very obvious in the hours > preceding our observations, seems to have come to an > end. The superhumps are much smaller than in any of our > previous observing nights, having an amplitude > of \'barely\' 0.06 mag. In between superhumps, there are > a number of dips. The most pronounced dip (the one > immediately preceding the superhump peaks) likely is to > be attributed to eclipses. > > Best regards, > Tonny Vanmunster > CBA Belgium Observatory > http://vsnet.lunarpages.com/cbabelgium > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > This mail sent through Wanadoo WebMail: http://webmail.wanadoo.be/ >