[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-alert 5251] Re: PQ Aql outburst
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 13:52:22 +0200
- To: vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, vsnet-campaign@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, Patrick Schmeer <extpasc@rz.uni-sb.de>
- From: Patrick Schmeer <p.schmeer@mx.uni-saarland.de>
- Subject: [vsnet-alert 5251] Re: PQ Aql outburst
- In-Reply-To: <200009121054.TAA05937@ceres.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>; from tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp on Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 07:54:18PM +0900
- References: <200009121054.TAA05937@ceres.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 07:54:18PM +0900, Taichi Kato wrote:
> PQ Aql outburst
>
> The long-period SU UMa-type candidate PQ Aql is reported to be in
> outburst. The last outburst was reported in 2000 March by Patrick Schmeer.
> A long outburst was observed in 1999 November (see below).
All in all I observed three PQ Aql outbursts with the IRO:
1999 Nov. 8 mag 14.5: supermaximum (vsnet-alert 3676)
2000 Mar. 17.519 UT mag 15: normal outburst (vsnet-alert 4419)
2000 Apr. 17 mag 15.5: supermaximum (vsnet-alert 4641)
The mean cycle length may be about 1 month and the supercycle about
5 months, so the current outburst could well be another supermaximum.
> YYYYMMDD(UT) mag observer
> 20000906.810 <151 (T. Kinnunen)
> 20000907.810 <153 (T. Kinnunen)
> 20000909.819 <153 (T. Kinnunen)
> 20000910.810 <153 (T. Kinnunen)
> 20000911.810 154 (T. Kinnunen)
>
> Time-resolved photoemtry during the present outburst is strongly encouraged
> in the context of continuing VSNET campaign.
>
> cf. vsnet-alert 3690:
>
> PQ Aql time-resolved CCD photometry
>
> From the CCD observation of PQ Aql on Nov. 9, we have detected light
> modulations (~0.10 mag), which may be attributable to superhumps.
> The possible period of the light modulation was 0.1 d or slightly longer,
> which makes definitive period determination difficult from a 3-hour run.
> Further observations are strongly urged to accurately determine the
> nature of the variability.
>
> Regards,
> Taichi Kato, Makoto Uemura
I thought PQ Aql had been confirmed as an SU UMa-type dwarf nova (cf. the
following report).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 19:54:02 +0900 (JST)
From: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Subject: [vsnet-obs 24717] PQ Aql (Ouda team) Nov. 13
PQ Aql (Ouda team) Nov. 13
Representative averaged magnitude:
AQLPQ 991113.445 15.42C Oud time-series, clear superhumps
Observers: T. Kato and M. Uemura
Telescope: 25-cm SCT + ST-7 unfiltered
Comparison: GSC1066.287, Rc=10.09 assumed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some CBAers (e.g. L.T. Jensen, T. Vanmunster) did also obtain time-series
during the 1999 November superoutburst, but I can't remember having seen
their results.
Regards,
Patrick
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp