[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-alert 5113] Re: Recovery of NSV 24062
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 13:49:16 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-alert
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-alert 5113] Re: Recovery of NSV 24062
- Cc: samus@sai.msu.su
- Sender: owner-vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: [vsnet-alert 4493] Recovery of NSV 24062
   The following object in question has faded, supportoing the Mira-type
classification.  See [vsnet-lpv 2] for more details.
   http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet-lpv/msg00002.html
Extracted from:
Subject: [vsnet-alert 4493] Recovery of NSV 24062
> Seiichi Yoshida and KenIchi Kadota recovered a possible symbiotic star
> discovered by Yukio Sakurai in 1994 (cf. IAUC 6051), NSV 24062. Here
> is the report. Everything is made clear by public discussion on the
> VSOLJ (Variable Star Observers' League in Japan) mailing list. Thanks
> so much for the contributors.
> 
> In the course of variable star survey based on the MISAO Project
> observations, Seiichi Yoshida discovered a variable star at
> R.A. 17h59m39s.58, Decl. -25o13'30".0 (2000.0) with a range of 10.8 -
> 12.4 mag from unfiltered CCD variable star survey images taken by
> Kadota between 1999 April and 2000 February, being supported by the
> semi-automated variable star detection by a software, the PIXY
> system. Here is the photometry:
> 
> 1999 Apr  8.75186	11.4C
> 1999 Apr  8.75242	11.4C
> 1999 Apr 30.74588	10.8C
> 1999 Apr 30.74631	10.9C
> 1999 Sep 23.42939	11.6C
> 1999 Sep 23.42981	11.5C
> 2000 Feb 24.83137	12.4C
> 
> The position and magnitude are measured with USNO-A1.0 catalog. 
> 
> Taichi Kato pointed out that this object is probably identified with 
> NSV 24062, a possible symbiotic star discovered by Yukio Sakurai in
> 1994 (cf. IAUC 6051). The position of NSV 24062 is R.A. 17h56m35s.54,
> Decl. -25o13'15".7 (1950.0), R.A. 17h59m40s.6, Decl. -25o13'24"
> (2000.0). Kato also pointed out that no observations have been
> reported since 1994 August.
> 
> The angular distance between these two stars is 15 arcsec. Therefore,
> we must have recovered the outburst of this star. And the position in
> IAUC 6051 is probably inaccurate.
> 
>   (omitted)
 Return to Daisaku Nogami
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp