Dear all, On every DSS scans (DSS1 Bj*2, R*1, DSS2 Bj*2, R*4), no possible precurser of the probable nova reported by K. Takamizawa is shown. The nearest stars in USNO-A1.0 are listed below, and no other star can be seen on DSS scans in the several arcsec neighbour of the reported position, except a hint of the object on DSS2 R scan at 18h52m02s.0, -01o28'20" (2000.0), which is about 6" south of the reported position. At the cataloged position of CI Aql (18h52m03s.5, -01o28'40" (2000.0) from GCVS online), there is another star also cataloged in USNO-A1.0. The identification of CI Aql, the eclipting binary reported in IBVS 4338, 4332), and this probable nova is going on. Prob. Nova 18h52m02s.0 -01o28'14" (2000.0) (reported by Takamizawa) USNO-A1.0 0825.13313509 18h52m02s.88 -01o28'15".7 (2000.0) r=16.9 b=20.1 USNO-A1.0 0825.13311349 18h52m01s.15 -01o28'20".1 (2000.0) r=17.2 b=19.8 CI Aql 11.-15.5p 18h52m03s.5 -01o28'40" (2000.0) GCVS online USNO-A1.0 0825.13314226 18h52m03s.48 -01o28'39".7 (2000.0) r=15.5 b=17.4 Sincerely Yours, Hitoshi Yamaoka, Kyushu Univ., Japan yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp