[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-alert 4589] Re: AB Nor unusual outburst (superoutburst?)
- Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 09:49:23 -0700
- To: "Taichi Kato" <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, <vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "William S G Walker" <astroman@voyager.co.nz>
- Subject: [vsnet-alert 4589] Re: AB Nor unusual outburst (superoutburst?)
- Reply-To: <astroman@voyager.co.nz>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Greetings,
The rebrightening of AB Nor looks very much like some of the delayed
superoutbursts of other stars with the precursor falling to a very low
level before triggering the main outburst.
In rather difficult conditions (4% SD) on April 8 I managed a run of 2.8
hours and measured one definite superhump with an amplitude of 0.4
magnitudes. Maximum was at Apr 08.55 and the period looked about 2 hours,
perhaps as much as 2.2 hours. But very uncertain in the absence of a second
peak.
Regards,
Stan
----------
> From: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
> To: vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
> Subject: [vsnet-alert 4574] AB Nor unusual outburst (superoutburst?)
> Date: Thursday, April 06, 2000 7:27 PM
>
> AB Nor unusual outburst (superoutburst?)
>
> Followed by the report by Andrew Pearce on the rare outburst on Apr. 1,
> Rod Stubbings reports a remarkable rebrightening on Apr. 6. The low
> outburst frequency, the large outburst amplitude and the unusual
development
> of outburst suggest that AB Nor is an excellent candidate of an SU
UMa-type
> dwarf nova, currently likely undergoing a superoutburst. Time-resolved
> CCD photometry is very strongly encouraged. Although Downes et al.
listed
> a revised astrometry of the object, the lack of a USNO counterpart at the
> cataloged position apparently requires further outburst astrometry.
> If the quiescent counterpart is fainter than mag 20, the object is now
> undergoing a large-amplitude (exceeding 6 mag) outburst.
>
> YYYYMMDD(UT) mag observer
> 20000325.795 <142 (A. Pearce)
> 20000326.839 <148 (A. Pearce)
> 20000327.804 <150 (A. Pearce)
> 20000328.794 <150 (A. Pearce)
> 20000329.560 <144 (R. Stubbings)
> 20000329.794 <150 (A. Pearce)
> 20000329.797 <150 (A. Pearce)
> 20000401.788 144 (R. Stubbings)
> 20000401.830 142 (A. Pearce)
> 20000402.744 148 (R. Stubbings)
> 20000402.806 147 (A. Pearce)
> 20000403.467 <146 (R. Stubbings)
> 20000405.458 <146 (R. Stubbings)
> 20000406.557 140 (R. Stubbings)
> 20000406.573 141 (R. Stubbings)
> 20000406.579 140 (R. Stubbings)
> 20000406.590 141 (R. Stubbings)
> 20000406.610 140 (R. Stubbings)
> 20000406.625 139 (R. Stubbings)
>
> For calibrating CCD photometry, the following star would be useful.
> The field also contains a number of Tycho and Tycho-2 stars.
>
> V B-V
> 154917.4 -430457 (2000.0) 13.70 LONEOS ABNor4(45) 0.67 - -
>
> We are very looking forward to hearing successful time-series CCD
photometry
> reports from worldwide, and please post timely to vsnet-alert
confirmatory
> observations, new findings, the progess of the outburst and observations.
>
> Regards,
> Taichi Kato
>
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp