FS AUR Gary Poyner's announcement of a brightnening in this star, a dwarf nova candidate, brings up some history. We in the CBA have been tracking the star episodically for the past two years, and it shows a pretty well-defined photometric period of 0.143 d (with no information yet about how, if at all, this depends on luminosity state). Yet John Thorstensen (the "horse's mouth" on such matters) firmly avows that the radial- velocity period is close to 0.0595 d. We've been trading "are you sure?" queries for two years. Well, at this point we *are* sure, but haven't the foggiest idea why the star should have two very well-defined, stable, and incommensurate periods. Wouldn't you like to help us find out? Photometry in the higher brightness state (perhaps not quite right to call it an "eruption" but anyway brighter) is likely to help us a lot. Will the signal be enhanced? reduced? destroyed? Who knows... there are precedents for all, and its actual behavior is likely to guide us along to find the right answer. So we're doing a CBA campaign on the star right now, and would greatly welcome your contributions! Joe Patterson CBA-New York jop@astro.columbia.edu www.astro.bio2.edu/cba