[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-alert 3975] Re: CW Mon - first results
- Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 15:16:35 -0800
- To: "Lew Cook" <lcoo@yahoo.com>, "Eric Broens" <Eric.Broens@advalvas.be>, <cba-news@astro.bio2.edu>, <vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "William S G Walker" <astroman@voyager.co.nz>
- Subject: [vsnet-alert 3975] Re: CW Mon - first results
- Cc: <erc@saao.ac.za>
- Reply-To: <astroman@voyager.co.nz>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Hi All,
OK, I've got the note regarding RXJ whatever. If it clears tonight I may
switch to that. I ran on CW Mon for 5.5 hours. There are eclipses ~0.4 mags
depth at 2000 Jan 08.40231 and Jan 08.57692. Close to the period of 4.229
hours. I'll post the actual data later in the day as I want to catch some
yachting and cricket!
There are also some oscillations of the type mentioned by Tonny and Eric -
actually the star looks like an IP but not as regular! Maybe it's all just
the normal flickering.
Regards,
Stan
----------
> From: Lew Cook <lcoo@yahoo.com>
> To: Eric Broens <Eric.Broens@advalvas.be>; cba-news@astro.bio2.edu;
vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
> Subject: [vsnet-alert 3974] Re: CW Mon - first results
> Date: Saturday, January 08, 2000 4:28 PM
>
> I only got an hours worth of data between clouds last night.
> Combining my data with Tonny's and running a PDM on it I get peaks at
>
>
> Period full
> (d) amplitude
> ------------------------
> 0.179 (0.04)
> 0.103 (see note)
> 0.075 (0.06)
> 0.062 (unclear- much scatter)
> 0.054 (0.05)
> 0.046 (0.04)
> 0.0165 (0.04)
>
> the broad peak at 0.103 and one at 0.179 which is probably influenced
> by the data gap more than anything else.
> I estimated the amplitudes visually from phase diagrams of the data.
> I'm posting the (admittedly poor quality image) PDM plot for the
> search from 0.0002 to 0.1 day at
>
> http://vsnet.geocities.com/lcoo/cwpdm51b.jpg
>
> For your viewing pleasure and comments.
>
> Lew
> http://vsnet.geocities.com/lcoo/
> --- Eric Broens <Eric.Broens@advalvas.be> wrote:
> > Using the PDM method on Vanmunsters observations I find following
> > periods rather than the ones mentioned by Tonny: 0.028 d (40 min)
> > and 0.100
> > d (2.4 h).
> > Both periods show an amplitude of 0.06 magnitudes.
> > Next to this periods the PDM method reveals weaker signals at 0.057
> > d and 0.088,
> > similar as the periods found by Tonny, but these periods are resp.
> > 2 and 3
> > times the period of 0.028 d.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Eric Broens
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> > VVS Werkgroep Veranderlijke Sterren
> >
> > Eric Broens
> > Wateringstraat 143
> > B-2400 Mol
> > BELGIUM
> >
> > E-Mail: Eric.Broens@advalvas.be
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp