[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-alert 2123] Re: Faint object in Triangulum
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 15:22:22 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, isn_chat@mbox.queen.it
- From: Hitoshi YAMAOKA <yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp>
- Subject: [vsnet-alert 2123] Re: Faint object in Triangulum
- Cc: yamaoka@rcsvr.rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp, g650359@edi.ulpgc.es
- Sender: owner-vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
cf. vsnet-alert 2115
http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet-alert/msg02115.html
cf. vsnet-alert 2116
http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet-alert/msg02116.html
cf. vsnet-alert 2120
http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet-alert/msg02120.html
Dr. Kato wrote:
> Considering there is also a suspect image (as pointed out by Yamaoka),
>we should now call them
>
>J015114+360550 : original object (new Tri)
>J015122+360323 : another one (pointed out by Yamaoka)
J015122+360323 seems to be a fault of the film or the scan, as Mr.
Suarez mentioned in [vsnet-alert 2115]:
>> During the check of a271.gif, I was aware that the object at (300,178)
>> is also absent in DSS image (and USNO, NED). What's that? No known
>> comets and asteroids were there, also.
>
> That is clearly a negative fault.
Indeed, J015122+360323 is not detected on Mr. Suarez's image on other
days, and also not on Mr. Garradd's image [vsnet-alert 2116].
Sincerely Yours,
Hitoshi YAMAOKA, Kyushu Univ., Japan
yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp