GZ Cnc: January 30 Kyoto observation Dear Colleagues, We have finished analyzing the January 30 Kyoto observation. Later on January 30, there appeared what strongly looked like superhumps (triangular profile, amplitude, period longer than the orbital one). However, the humps (superhumps?) do not seem to be as periodic as in usual SU UMa-type dwarf novae. In conjunction with Nyrola team's and Greg Bolt's observation, there may be "genuine superhumps", but some hump maxima fail to occur, or even the nature of the humps is rapidly changing..? What a queer phenomenon! We probably need more data and further analysis before to reveal this strange object. Further observations are absolutely encouraged! Regards, Taichi Kato VSNET Collaboration team