> * Eclipse I. Hipparcos' period (6.236 d.) can be confirmed and refined to > 6.2369 d. This is a cromospherically active star, so EA/RS type. Well, forget about that. I shouldn't jump to conclusions that easily... Tonight's observation was also 6.9, so the star is faint again when it shouldn't be... I had reported two eclipses this week based on this faint state.. Of course they agreed in phase with the "eclipses" but any other observation in the middle would have been "an eclipse" too. I searched for photometric data on this star and I found: UBV(RI)c photometry of active stars. IX (Cutispoto+, 2001) With this in hand I could fold a rather complete lightcurve that shows a marked periodicity. There are 10 clear maxima and 7 minima. I found an average 27.15 days period for the minima and 27.83 day period for the maxima. They give a mean period of 27.49 d. According to the reference this is a system made up of a K2/3III and a F8V star. The amplitude and mean magnitude of each cycle is variable. Calibrating Hipparcos data with the simultaneous V photometry, gives a total range for the period March 1990, february 1994 of V= 6.718 - 6.972. There is also a fainter measurement in the GCPD so the total range measured is 6.72-7.01V The star is slightly redder at minimum but the color variation in B-V doesn't exceed 0.05 mag. (1.12-1.17) The clasification is not EA/RS then. I think that these are pulsations from the orange giant. Or could they be great spots in the giant? Isn't it a too late type for this RS activity? Regards, Sebastian. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://vsnet.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release Date: 25/11/02