[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-obs 30891] Re: [vsnet-chat 3814] Re: [FWD] data deletion
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:01:08 +0100
- To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, vsnet-obs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Patrick Schmeer <extpasc@rz.uni-sb.de>
- Subject: [vsnet-obs 30891] Re: [vsnet-chat 3814] Re: [FWD] data deletion
- Cc: mikesimonsen@mindspring.com
- In-Reply-To: <005901c0581a$01b4e440$7dd479a5@computer>; from mikesimonsen@mindspring.com on Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 09:30:25PM -0500
- References: <200011270014.JAA03726@rcsvr.rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp> <005901c0581a$01b4e440$7dd479a5@computer>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-obs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 09:30:25PM -0500, Mike Simonsen wrote:
> Regarding Patrick Schmeer's suggestions in vsnet-obs 30882:
Actually these suggestions were sent privately to Taichi Kato and were not
intended to be published on VSNet.
> Why would anyone suggest that Maciej's or my observations of IX Dra be
> deleted? We are both using a chart based on the Henden/ Sumner sequence for
> this star.
I don't know either :-)
Actually I suggested only the deletion of the WY Tri observations from the
CV Circular.
> As for deleting the observations of WY Tri, if it had been in outburst I
> believe I would have seen it in this field even though I was looking for it
> east of it's actual position. Indeed, if I thought my observations were of
> little or no value I would have already suggested they be excluded.
Hmm... I thought this suggestion was implied in the following sentence
(vsnet-obs 30851):
> I'm embarrassed to say how far away from there I was looking.
> ...
> Mike
Regards,
Patrick
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp