[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-obs 30076] VS Observations - Corrections
- Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:16:39 +0800
- To: "vsnet-obs" <vsnet-obs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "Andrew Pearce" <arpearce@ozemail.com.au>
- Subject: [vsnet-obs 30076] VS Observations - Corrections
- Cc: "aavso" <observations@aavso.org>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-obs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
As pointed out correctly by Albert Jones, my recent observations of EX Lup have
been in error due to the use of an old chart. The following observations should
be deleted:
LUPEX 000910.543 111 Pea.RASNZ
LUPEX 000917.515 113 Pea.RASNZ
LUPEX 000918.515 112 Pea.RASNZ
LUPEX 000920.526 113 Pea.RASNZ
LUPEX 000921.524 112 Pea.RASNZ
LUPEX 000924.523 112 Pea.RASNZ
LUPEX 000925.541 113 Pea.RASNZ
They should be replaced by the following:
LUPEX 000910.543 <126 Pea.RASNZ
LUPEX 000917.515 <126 Pea.RASNZ
LUPEX 000918.515 <126 Pea.RASNZ
LUPEX 000920.526 <126 Pea.RASNZ
LUPEX 000921.524 <126 Pea.RASNZ
LUPEX 000924.523 <126 Pea.RASNZ
LUPEX 000925.541 <126 Pea.RASNZ
Also I have now corrected the recent magnitude estimates of V725 Sgr as the
close comparison star of mag 13.6 was not resolved in the 8" reflector used.
The standard logarithmic formula for combined magnitudes was used. The
following observations should be deleted:
SGRV725 000917.569 125 Pea.RASNZ
SGRV725 000918.542 124 Pea.RASNZ
SGRV725 000920.562 124 Pea.RASNZ
SGRV725 000921.545 121 Pea.RASNZ
SGRV725 000924.560 121 Pea.RASNZ
SGRV725 000925.553 122 Pea.RASNZ
SGRV725 000930.560 122 Pea.RASNZ
The should be replaced by the following:
SGRV725 000917.569 129 Pea.RASNZ
SGRV725 000918.542 128 Pea.RASNZ
SGRV725 000920.562 128 Pea.RASNZ
SGRV725 000921.545 124 Pea.RASNZ
SGRV725 000924.560 124 Pea.RASNZ
SGRV725 000925.553 125 Pea.RASNZ
SGRV725 000930.560 125 Pea.RASNZ
Regards
Andrew Pearce
Western Australia
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp