From f.m.ewalt@snet.net Mon Mar 6 09:15 JST 2000 Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 19:13:51 -0500 From: "Frederick M. EWALT" <f.m.ewalt@snet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> CC: Hitoshi YAMAOKA <yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp>, Brian Skiff <bas@lowell.edu> Subject: Supernova Magnitude Observations Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Length: 1946 Dear Mr. Taichi Kato: Here are two my most recent supernova magnitude observations, and a third, for SN199gi, which went unreported due to a technical oversight. YYYYMMDD (UT) MAG OBSERVER COMMENTS: SN1999gi 20000206.183 145C (F.M.Ewalt) SN2000j 20000301.025 189C (F.M.Ewalt) May be Fading SN1999em 20000301.159 159C (F.M.Ewalt) JPEG "display type" images supporting these observations have been submitted to, and may be downloaded from the following website: "http://vsnet.ggw.org/asras/snimages" Requests for "FTS" raw images should be submitted to the originator. For Brian Skiff: VSNET isn_chat message on SN Astrometry I utilize CCDSoft and the SKY Level IV by Software Bisque, for both Astrometric SN position verification and Photometric SN magnitude measurements. I use at least the three SAO and/or GSC stars nearest in position proximity, and magnitude to that of the SN. All reference values are as listed from the Hubble or HIPARCOS databases, and are according to what is provided by a physical match between the raw image and the virtual sky, using the CCD image overlay capabilities of CCDSoft and the SKY Level IV. I use either of two SBIG CCD Cameras, ST7E or ST9E, on either of two MEADE LX200 10" scopes, f/10 or f/6.3, supplemented by either of two focal reducers, f/6.3 or f/4. From the standpoint of an Amateur Observer, and considering my military background in POLARIS/POSIEDON Submarine Navigation, it is my opinion that these resources and methods, carefully applied, provide both consistent and accurate results, well within sigma. Could you please provide an E-mail address or other method to contact Mr. Dan Green at the Central Bureau. It is my opinion that SN2000j may probably be past maximum and possibly is fading. Thanks for your personal interest and support the Amateur Astronomers who make the majority of the VSNET reported measurements. Fred E.