I have checked the situation regarding GSC 1615 0966 = OW Aql (?) in my copy of Vehrenberg's Atlas Stellarum. The chart of 19h40m+10, taken August 6 1967, shows this star at about mpg 11, but on the chart of 19h40+20, taken August 17 1971, it is missing. The variable is rather close to the edge of the field, and the latter chart does not go very far beyond mpg 11 there, but it suggests strongly that there is NO mag 10 foreground star missing on the AAVSO f-chart, but that indeed OW Aql is identical to GSC 1615 0966. The real source of the confusion may be the period of 194 days given in the GCVS. This undoubtedly is totally and utterly wrong, because Mark's observations show it already near magnitude 10 for almost 3 months, almost half the proposed period. It is very likely that this very red variable of spectral type N has a much longer period, maybe 2 (or 3?) times 194 days. --------------------------------------------------- Reinder J. Bouma email: rjbouma@wxs.nl Bekemaheerd 77 or: rjbouma@planet.nl 9737PR Groningen The Netherlands phone: +31 (0)50-5418227 ---------------------------------------------------