Re: [vsnet-obs 13847] Obs 15/16.8. S10828 Timo Kinnunen wrote: > S10828 19980815.95 <15.0 (*) > (*) I wonder if this is still among susp. variables, > ie. not an asteroid or something else? You mena this? (I think it's S10808) > 144056.18 +135431.9 1950 Nv1962 Boo N? UG? 10.5-20:P This suspected nova/dwarf nova has been confirmed to be caused by the double exposure (I have read somewhere in MVS or else). V360 Her is a similar case. Regards, Taichi Kato