[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

[vsnet-chat 6973] Re: Weighing the options



Re: Weighing the options

>      I agree.  The 'sky coverage' plot for variables would have to be
> "smarter" than for asteroids.  For instance, one could show just the
> CVs with positive observations brighter than some value above the nominal
> quiescent level (i.e. don't need observing unless a special program is
> active to acquire astrophysical observations---which could be flagged),
> or those CVs without positive observations in the previous xx hours
> and brighter than xx when in outburst, etc.

   Well, the number of CVs is not so large, this purpose is almost already
accomplished by daily vsnet-cvcirc messages (or AAVSO personal news flash
service).  More specifically, vsnet-recent-wanted will bring you daily
requests of observations of many CVs ;-).

> Similarly, you could show
> long-period variables not observed in the past x.x fraction of phase,
> weighted so you'd get more observations near minimum (say), or other
> parameters.

   In LPVs, this approach is not extremely practical, since the number
of objects is very large, and one must know which phases were observed
by the observer before using such service.  This requirement is usually
beyond human memory; in other words, a traditional strategy spreadsheet
(or vsnet-miracirc) can equally serve visual observers.

>      Under the smart scheme you probably would because the person who
> seeks only SS Cyg likely doesn't have the wherewithal to observe V1668 Cyg,
> so "tonight" that guy/gal doesn't care about V1668 Cyg.

   I simply showed a location-oriented plot (of recent observations)
may not be very practical (assuming that SS Cyg and V1668 Cyg are located
within 1 degree).  The same would be true for V630 Cyg and V632 Cyg.
There is no guranteee that V632 Cyg was observed when there was
an observation of V630 Cyg.  For individual visual observations
of CVs, object-oriented service is more practical than location-oriented one.

>      Just about everything any of us does is more superficial than
> could be inferred from words we write about them.   B-)

   Everyone should remember this :-)

Regards,
Taichi Kato


Return to Home Page

Return to the Powerful Daisaku Nogami

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Powered by ooruri technology