Return to Home Page
Re: [vsnet-obs 47112] v511 observation Not v511, but "V511 Cyg". Write the object name correctly. > I am looking at some images taken on 20030921 of field's Cygnus with a > 25 cm Newton telescope > f/4.8 on a 35 mm film T Max 400 b/w, 5 minutes of exposure. > > I Have found that CYGV511 is brigther than the magnitude reported in > gcvs200 catalog > 14.7-16.9p. You must have read the earlier problem associated with the same object. You must first of all state how the identification problem was solved before making another report without much details. You must explain how you become confident that you have attained the requested quality. Without this information, your reports will be simple garbage. See below: === > Re: [vsnet-obs 46184] p magnitude of variable stars > > > CYGV511 20030721.862 11.27p TSc (+/-0.12) > > CYGV511 20030721.869 11.15p TSc (+/-0.18) > > It is obvious that you still don't pay attention to make correct > identifications. We have said this enough, and we don't need your > similar observations any more. This region of the sky has been fully > examined for correct identifications by the GCVS team. There is no > excuse for you not to refer to the official correct IDs. > === > Really I Have make attention at this observation because I Have noted the > nonstar GSC 3574:2369 at position 20 43 17.31 +45 45 3.5. > > I Have decided to send the data because I Have measured the following > astrometric position on the images: AR 20 43 17.270(+/-0.544) decl +45 45 > 25.18(+/-5.47 arcsec), using 11 stars of the GSC Tycho Catalog. > > Unfortunateky I not can to use USNO A2 to make more precise astrometry. As all but you must be aware, this is nothing related to variable star identification. What is needed for you before reporting anything is to make correct identification. Before this is firmly established, you are requested not to report anything. You are no longer a novice person, and you must understand what process is necessary before reporting. Until you become confident that you have attained the above quality, don't reply to this message, which would be simply a loss of everyone's time. (If you are going to discuss on general matters of variable star identifications, use vsnet-chat rather than vsnet-obs). Regards, Taichi Kato
Return to the Daisaku
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
