Return to Home Page
This message is to inform Samus' decision. It would be obvious to readers what scientific merits and demerits are being weighed by the GCVS team. I will simply keep faithful to science and readers' wish. Regards, Taichi Kato === Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:58:28 +0400 (MSD) From: "Nikolai N. Samus" <samus@sai.msu.ru> Subject: Re: [vsnet-gcvs 541] (fwd) Re: (fwd) Re: V5113 Sgr = Nova Sgr 2003 No.2 OK, you will never get anything to forward from me any more if you don't understand kind requests. On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Taichi Kato wrote: > Forwarded message - a measure to make things clear. I will forward > any message whose public presence will be helpful. > > Regards, > Taichi Kato > === > > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:45:42 +0400 (MSD) > From: "Nikolai N. Samus" <samus@sai.msu.ru> > Subject: Re: [vsnet-gcvs 540] (fwd) Re: V5113 Sgr = Nova Sgr 2003 No.2 > > Dear Dr. Kato, > > I would have appreciated your sending me your thoughts in a personal > message. Very probably, you are right, and we could discuss the > problem with Dr. Green again. However, after my explicit request not to > circulate my message to you, I consider your reaction as quite unfriendly. > It is a shock for me that VSNET considers it possible not to take into > account a request from me, knowing our attention to your work and our > appreciation of all your effort. > > Yours sincerely > Nikolai N. Samus > > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Taichi Kato wrote: > > > Relayed here, after deliberate consideration, because relaying this > > information is more beneficial to the public rather than keeping it > > within personal communications. > > > > I have a feeling that logicial basis for not consdiering this object > > as a nova is too tenuous. I would rather expect a decision by the > > GCVS team to issue the permanent name for this object, since the > > variable star nomenclature system is not affected by such a slight > > difference whether or not the nova nature of an object is widely > > received. There have been a number of instances in which permanent > > GCVS names were issued (e.g. V445 Pup) before the nova-type nature > > is established. I don't find a special reason to exclude this object > > in Crux from an equivalent process of consideration. > > > > Regards, > > Taichi Kato > > === > > > > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:41:40 +0400 (MSD) > > From: "Nikolai N. Samus" <samus@sai.msu.ru> > > Subject: Re: [vsnet-gcvs 536] V5113 Sgr = Nova Sgr 2003 No.2 > > > > Dear Dr. Kato, > > > > The answer about Nova Cru is NO. We were discussing this with Dr. Green, > > but then he became not sure about the star being a Nova, and the process > > was temporaly stopped. Since this is our internal process, please do not > > circulate this information over VSNET. > > > > Best regards > > Kolya > > > > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Taichi Kato wrote: > > > > > V5113 Sgr = Nova Sgr 2003 No.2 > > > > > > The above designation has been given in IAUC 8206. Use this permanent > > > GCVS name for further reporting. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Taichi Kato > > > > > > PS. I wonder whether a permanent GCVS name for Nova Cru 2003 has already > > > been assigned. > > > > > >
Return to the Powerful Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
