Return to Home Page
I have not seen the paper which is referred, but a quick check of some older publications turned up some possible candidates. Two close O stars may have had their HD numbers switched and/or garbled. Have a look at these. HD RA 2000 DEC 2000 Sp. (Houk) Sp. - MK V 101190 11:38:09.92 -63:11:48.6 O7 O6 III (f) 7.32 101223 11 38 22.76 -63 12 02.8 O7 O8 V (f) 8.71 Houk's spectral types are from the Michigan Catalogue of HD star. The MK types date from before 1980 (source unknown). HD101190 is also NSV 18824. Hope this helps, Regards, Mati morel@ozemail.com.au ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sebastian Otero" <varsao@fullzero.com.ar> To: <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>; <vsnet-id@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Cc: "Gabriel Giust" <gagiust@fullzero.com.ar>; "Astrid Behrens" <astridbeh@arnet.com.ar>; "BED" <enzodb@fullzero.com.ar>; "Cecilia" <cecimacros@yahoo.com.ar>; "Federico Claus" <nclaus@infovia.com.ar>; "surastronomico" <surastronomico@fullzero.com.ar> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 11:18 PM Subject: [vsnet-id 847] Confusing ID= HD 101213 > I found another confussion. Can someone clarify?: > > Ouzts, C. & Penny, L. R., Fundamental Parameters of the O-Type, Eclipsing > Binary, HD 101213, 2001 AAS, 199, 0603. > > In the abstract of this paper they describe an O star observed by Hipparcos. > BUT searching through SIMBAD, HD 101213 is a G8 star never observed by the > satellite.. > Which is the eclipsing binary??? > > Regards, > Sebastian. >
Return to the Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
