Return to Home Page
I have checked, and tass does not have any data on this star. We will get there in about 3 months and then it will depend on how bright it is in I and how good the nights are when it transits. Looks like it is just at the edge of what we will see. Tom Droege At 03:08 PM 6/11/03 +1000, Mati Morel wrote: > Before Tom K. starts submitting data on V449 Lyr, I respectfully suggest >he specify exactly which star he has observed. There is some developing >confusion about the position of V449 Lyr. >Firstly, the coordinates published by Romano (and used by Guide 8) are bad. >Please disregard. >Secondly, Romano's finder chart is quite clear. His variable, no. 249, is >the middle star in a line of three running SW-NE. >See IBVS 645. This is my understanding of the identity of V449 Lyr, unless >he has published a later correction, somewhere ... >Coordinates for these stars are as follows (from B1.0), and mb from A2.0. > # (2000) mb > 1 19:07:35.66 +43:59:53.9 14.9 (GCVS id) > 2 19:07:37.07 +44:00:20.1 15.0 (Romano) > 3 19:07:38.63 +44:00:43.3 12.4 > >Star 1 is listed in the GCVS, but appears to be in error. >Star 2 is Romano's variable 249 = V449 Lyr, on his finder chart. >The rough position published in IBVS 3701 is consistent with star 2. >Perhaps the published maximum mag. for this star is a typo, or the result of >confusion with star 3. >The B1.0 magnitudes for star 2 are as follows : B1 = 15.94, B2 = 18.20, R1 >= 14.43, R2 = 15.58, I =14.04. > >Regards, >Mati > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Brian Skiff" <Brian.Skiff@lowell.edu> >To: <dhkaiser@sprynet.com> >Cc: <aavso-discussion@informer2.cis.McMaster.CA> >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:25 AM >Subject: Re: [AAVSO-DIS] V449 Lyr - does AAVSO want my data? > > > > It is worth noting that there is indeed _no_ published study of > > this star, and only recently have the GCVS group given a precise > > position for the star. The current 'best' position is from 2MASS: > > > > V449 Lyr 19 07 35.68 +43 59 53.0 (J2000) > > > > SIMBAD shows only the discovery paper, which has no lightcurve >information, > > and Mati Morel's IBVS flyer with a somewhat improved position (the on-line > > GCVS is better still, and the 2MASS position more-or-less definitive). > > The star is fairly faint on all Schmidt plate scans, so (as Mati >suggested) > > the nominal maximum magnitude could be too bright. > > I note that the 2MASS J-K color is about 0.6, which is the color of > > an unreddened K0 giant. Thus instead of an Algol- or W UMa-type eclipser, > > it could be an RS CVn type---assuming the classification as an ecliper > > is correct at all. > > > > \Brian > > _______________________________________________ > > aavso-discussion mailing list > > aavso-discussion@mailman.McMaster.CA > > http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/aavso-discussion > >_______________________________________________ >aavso-discussion mailing list >aavso-discussion@mailman.McMaster.CA >http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/aavso-discussion
Return to the Powerful Daisaku
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
