>> You can observe lots of sky once a night, or you can observe a little of >> sky a lot. Can't do both without a whole lot more money than there >> is out there for this type of project. Just need a couple or three similar systems in each hemisphere--- not that big of a deal. I think Pojmanski realizes his current observing cadence isn't the best, and says as much at his Web site. A simple fix would be to do blocks of fields that get two visits say an hour or two apart. Another possiblity is to rig the fields with center-to-corner overlaps so that any spot shows up in multiple frames in the course of a night. In general there's a trade-off between sky-coverage and magnitude limit. If you want only mag. 8 or 9, just use a full-frame fisheye lens for 35mm format with a ~25mm square chip, and you can get most of the sky in a single shot. Pojmanski's system covers a 9x9-deg field and gets the southern hemisphere on the timescale of 3 days or so down to mag. 14. Scale cadence speed and magnitude limit from there. \Brian
Return to the Powerful Daisaku
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp