[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

[vsnet-chat 6350] ASAS-3 and a couple of periodic variables



Subject: [vsnet-chat 6349] Re: RS Ophiuchi ASAS-3 chart


>      You can, of course, test this.  You can use either the Landolt or
> Cousins E-region standards to test the errors as a function of magnitude,
> color, and consistency across the sky.  Although it's trickier, you could
> use a strictly periodic variable like an RR Lyrae or W UMa star to
> look at consistency as a function of phase (i.e. how well the ASAS3 data
> reproduce a recently-studied "good" variable).

Done.
I randomly chose an EW and a RRab stars and test ASAS-3 data quality.
I used Hipparcos Epoch photometry transformed to V to compare.
The results are at:
http://ar.geocities.com/varsao/Curvas_UX_Ret_y_V338_Pup.htm

The stars are UX Reticuli (EW) and V338 Puppis (RRab)

Doing this I stumbled upon a discrepance that I had stumbled upon before:
When I transformed Hp mag. to V magnitudes I realized there was a 0.015 mag.
difference with the V values in the GCVS.
Since it had happened to me before [V468 Pup (1999A&A...341..469C) and AZ
Dor (1999A&A...346..134B)] I suspected they were Geneva V magnitudes not
transformed to Johnson's V.
All the stars that entered the GCVS by means of a paper with Geneva data
suffer from this lack of transformation.
(In this case: HD 47147 - A small-amplitude extreme metal-poor RRab
pulsating variable, Grenon, M.; Waelkens, C.
1986A&A...155...24G)
When one reads "V" in the GCVS assumes Johnson's V but it's not always the
rule...
It turns out that this 0.015 mag. difference is explained by the difference
of the two photometric systems, where Geneva's V can be even 0.02 mag.
brighter for the bluest stars.
It also turns out that ASAS-3 data confirm this, which means its external
accuracy is higher than 0.015 mag. for this star.

Results: ASAS-3 data is comparable -or even better in the case of faint
stars- with Hipparcos' accuracy.
Comparing both sets of data is even possible a more accurate period
determination for both stars:

UX Reticuli - EW - V= 8.19-8.92 - HJD 2452721.546 + 0.490104 x E
V338 Puppis - RRab - V= 9.09-9.27 - HJD 2451952.583 + 0.797324 x E
(Hipparcos = 0.79733; Grenon and Waelkens = 0.79732)

Best wishes,
Sebastian.





Return to Home Page

Return to the Powerful Daisaku

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Powered by ooruri technology