[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

[vsnet-chat 6271] Re: [vsnet-campaign-rcb 129] DY Cru slowly fading?




>    According to the ASAS-3 survey data, the R CrB-like star
> DY Cru may be steadily fading (currently around V=8.8).

Dear all,

...and first of all, what a treasure the ASAS-3 catalogue is!!

I have analised the data and prepared a lightcurve combining my observations
and those form ASAS-3.
There is a wide spread of magnitudes between different apertures for DY Cru
that can reach as much as 0.4 mag.
I have taken the most consistent values I found, in this case the "mag. 1"
results. Comparing my observations with the 5 different apertures I found
that the magnitudes for "mag.3" are in agreement with my visual data so I
measured the average difference between the consistent "mag.1" data and the
"mag.3" dataset that matches my observations well (there is no way to say if
the zero-point is totally correct but it gives the possibility of getting a
nice and comparable lightcurve).
The resulting magnitudes were folded in the lightcurves at:
http://ar.geocities.com/varsao/Curva_DY_Cru.htm

Some things are apparent:

Between JD 2451880 and 2452150, the star underwent a typical pulsation
cycle, approximately 270 days-long The end of the cycle is not observed so
it can be longer).
This smooth variation was followed by a more chaotic behaviour (as it was
before JD 2451880).
An inset for the last months shows only low amplitude variations in shorter
time-scales.
A maximum seems to have been missed around JD 2452560.
Last weeks there is a more marked discrepance between different ASAS-3
datasets.

The highest maxima are around:

JD     Mag

~2450930      8.4
~2451480    ~8.5
2452030      8.45
2452560      ~8.6

or 530-550 days apart

The deepest minima are around:

2451350        9.8
2451880        9.7
~2452400    ~9.1

or 520-530 days apart

However, there are a lot of ups and downs in the middle including long
standstills such as that between HJD 2451570 and 2451800 (V= 8.9-9.1) that
even included another maximum around JD 2451750 (270-280 days apart from the
brightest maxima mentioned above or almost half a cycle)

I would keep calling it an L-type star...

The present behaviour is completely normal, the star being around V= 9.1

Best regards,
Sebastian.


Return to Home Page

Return to the Powerful Daisaku Nogami

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Powered by ooruri technology