(??) I wonder why there was a so large (0.4 mag) difference betwen
"Henden photometry" and "Henden/Sumner photometry", which must have been
derived from the same photometric material?
I also noticed that there were several CCD estimates in the past which
were systematically fainter than visual observations. I don't think
all these observers used the AAVSO chart; there may have been a common
origin of zero-point mistake.
Return to the Powerful Daisaku
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp