[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

[vsnet-chat 6024] Re: Naked-eye limits



Re: [vsnet-chat 6020] Naked-eye limits

> But, as far as taking scientifically useful data for variable stars goes,
> what is the point of these extraordinary cases? The vast majority of
> observers who will submit their observations to VSNET or AAVSO will have a
> NELM around 7.6 at 50% detection. I dont think it is a good idea to
> suggest observers should strive to make estimates at 5% detection just to
> go deeper.

   Although it will not be very meaningful to suggest naked-eye observers
to strive for this, it will be meaningful to observers who are working
with the largest possible instrument.

> In fact, at this low detection
> rate, I commonly see a fainter comp star appear brighter than a brighter
> comp star! You just cannot make a reliable comparison based on these
> "pops" or flashes of view you get.

   If you feel insufficient statistics, you probably need to increase the
watching time to make a better time-average.  An instantanenous watch at
such faint stars can be misleading.

   People have been inventing a method (although it is difficult to explain
by words) to more meaningfully treat with these low frequency detections.
As I showed yesterday, the statitical limiting accuracy at this detection
rate is not so poor as expected.  Such a method is comparable to an effort
by Sebastian to get accurate V estimates with human eyes.  Someone would
not want to believe an accurate estimate can be made in Sebastian's method,
too.  But the reality is not.  A slight difference between Sebastian's and
Hasegawa-san's methods is that the latter apparently needs more mental
concentration.  Hasegawa-san sometimes expressed an extreme degree of
exhaustion.

> The error on the estimate is probably
> going to be worse than 0.5 mag at these low detection rates. Why corrupt
> the database with such poor values?

   Should we not report observations whose errors may exceed 0.5 mag?
There seem to be a comparable or larger scatter at least in some objects.

Regards,
Taichi Kato


Return to Home Page

Return to the Powerful Daisaku Nogami

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Powered by ooruri technology