[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 4808] Re: Variable star charts for southern observers
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 00:16:21 -0700 (MST)
- To: tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Brian Skiff <bas@lowell.edu>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 4808] Re: Variable star charts for southern observers
- Cc: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Kato-san wrote:
>> Please...advise the same thing to [professionals]...
The pros are perhaps even more likely to do this! This doesn't mean
you should imitate them. It's okay for observers to use some short form for
convenience while taking data (scribbled notes or maybe a CCD frame header).
Just don't publish the truncated name on a chart, in a database, in a paper,
or in a catalogue: it just adds confusion to the already confused literature.
>> Some examples...please let us know which is correct and which is wrong?
Poking around in SIMBAD yields these full-name IDs and some improved
coordinates. It should be easy to use the positions in the CV catalogue to
search in SIMBAD for other cases. (SIMBAD, by the way, has all the names
correctly linked.)
1RXS J0001-6707 ---> 1RXS J000154.2-670749 = EC 23593-6724:
0 01 55.09 -67 07 43.4 (2000, UCAC1); 2MASS J-K=0.35
EXO 0329-2606 ---> EXO 0329.9-2606 = VY For
RX J0501-0359 ---> RX J0501.7-0359 = HY Eri
RX J0558+6753 ---> RX J0558.3+6753: 5 58 17.89 +67 53 46.1 (2000, 2MASS);
2MASS J-K=0.4
RX J0643-2052: did this one, yes?
1E 0643-1648 ---> 1E 0643.0-1648 = HL CMa
RX J191059.6+285639: okay
RX J2123.7+421 ---> RX J2123.7+4217 = V2069 Cyg: 21 23 44.80 +42 18 01.6
(2000, 2MASS); 2MASS J-K=0.6
AX J2315-592 (okay) = CP Tuc
\Brian
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp