[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 4677] Re: [vsnet-obs 34934] Re: V1329 Cyg and observations
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 19:00:26 +0100 (BST)
- To: Maciej Reszelski <macres@pro.onet.pl>
- From: Gary Poyner <gp@star.sr.bham.ac.uk>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 4677] Re: [vsnet-obs 34934] Re: V1329 Cyg and observations
- cc: Michelverdenet@aol.com, vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, Afoevb@aol.com
- In-Reply-To: <01f301c11b3f$53159ee0$6edc4cd5@MaciejReszelski>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
I would agree that V1329 Cyg is brighter now than for some time, but
my observation on Jly 31st does not indicate that it's as bright as
Michel suggests. Maciej is probably right in saying there are sequence
differences. My chart (TA, based upon AAVSO circular 142, 1982) has
obvious problems, but didn't see the need to change until 'real' photometry
became available! Maybe it will be forthcoming now that the problems
have been highlighted.
Clear skies,
Gary Poyner
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Maciej Reszelski wrote:
>
>
> > I think there is a problem about V1329 Cyg..it is clearly brighter now
> than
> > the mag 13.5 to 13.5 given by some observers!!!
> > I observe it for a long time, it was again HBV 475... the star is
> not
> > so far from the neighbour of mv 12.2....
> > The observations published by VSNET seems to show a rapid variation from
> 12.7
> > to 13.8 which are not real, I think
>
> Dear Michel
>
> I think there's existing some different sequences. I using AAVSO chart PF82.
> I try check this sequence soon (possible tonight). And what you using?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Maciej
>
>
>
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp