[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 4667] Re: [vsnet-campaign-dn 1026] True amplitude of WZ Sge?
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 13:06:42 +0200 (METDST)
- To: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: erik kuulkers <erikk@sron.nl>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 4667] Re: [vsnet-campaign-dn 1026] True amplitude of WZ Sge?
- cc: vsnet-campaign-dn@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- In-Reply-To: <200107280444.NAA29885@ceres.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
DEar Taichi Kato,
It may be because of the photographic observations taken during the 1913
outburst (see the composite light curves I made). There the maximum was
brighter than the 1946/1978 outbursts, which was composed of mainly visual
and photometric data. If understand correctly there's a difference of
about 0.5 magntiude between photgraphic 'V' and photometric/visual 'V'.
Also there's a spread in between visual measurements between different
observers of up to 0.5 magnitude.
Best regards,
Erik
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Taichi Kato wrote:
> True amplitude of WZ Sge?
>
> Looking at the current outburst, I am wondering about the reality of
> the 7.0 mag maximum documented in the literature. This was the point
> which I had a discussion with Dr. Nogami, who made a compilation of
> dwarf nova parameters. The maxima of the past two outbursts of WZ Sge have
> been around 8.0 or even fainter (averaging "early superhumps"). Could
> the 7.0 magnitude have been a result of different sensitivity of photographic
> plates and different comparison stars?
>
> Regards,
> Taichi Kato
>
>
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp