[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 4556] (fwd) Re: [vsnet-alert 6017] Re: Possible Nova in Sco
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:37:33 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 4556] (fwd) Re: [vsnet-alert 6017] Re: Possible Nova in Sco
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
(fwd) Re: [vsnet-alert 6017] Re: Possible Nova in Sco
From: gian.masi@flashnet.it
Subject: Re: [vsnet-alert 6017] Re: Possible Nova in Sco
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:09:17 +0200 (CEST)
Dear Arne,
> Gianluca,
> My comment was meant to draw attention to the typical
> observer that the field is crowded and normal techniques
> of astrometry may not work; you have to be careful to
> select stars that are clear of neighbors, not only for
> your CCD astrometric extraction, but also because the
> USNO-A catalog has problems with blended stars. You
> are a careful observer, and I was pretty sure that you
> had taken this into account, but since there are several
> thousand USNO-A stars in the field, I was wondering how
> you made your selection of only 8.
I appreciated your previous note, as I find your comments
very useful to improve my knowledge of these topics. I used
only 8 reference stars as I selected them manually (no
automatic astrometry!), looking for single, bright -but not
saturated- stars.
> The second reason for the post was to again suggest
> that people use UCAC in the galactic bulge area. USNO-A
> and GSC both have major problems with the photographic
> density on the plates and give a lot of false detections
> as well as poor astrometry on the blends. UCAC has
> avoided those problems with CCD astrometry and is more
> modern epoch anyway. Tycho2 is another alternative if
> you have a reasonably wide field with short exposure.
> If you use UCAC, I'd prefer that you use the original
> distribution or Vizier, but some software packages
> are not capable of doing that and so the next best
> solution is the reformatted UCAC on my ftp site. I'd
> be interested in your astrometry on the field with
> the UCAC catalog; I bet your residuals drop to 0.1arcsec
> or so (at least mine do!).
I'll let you know when I'll measure with this other
catalogue. By the way: is there any place where I can order
a CD with this UCAC? Also,k where I can learn more on this
cat on the web?
Sincerely,
Gianluca
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp