[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 4429] Re: (fwd) Strange Star Near M51
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 11:02:58 +0200 (METDST)
- To: Wouter van Reeven <reeven@strw.leidenuniv.nl>
- From: erik kuulkers <erikk@sron.nl>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 4429] Re: (fwd) Strange Star Near M51
- cc: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, labbey@mindspring.com
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105101051580.22781-100000@zaan.strw.leidenuniv.nl>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Hmmm, true. I misread that they were taken just after each other; I
thought they were taken on different days...
But Lenny Abbey mentions he checked other images (his?) and conclude it
must be a real star. I'm wondering now what kind of images were checked
and when they were taken.
Erik
> Sorry, that's no possibility. A nova just cannot appear on one image and
> disappear on the next while the two images are less then an hour apart.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Wouter van Reeven
>
> > Maybe it is a nova? What is the position of the "missing" star?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Erik
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 10 May 2001, Wouter van Reeven wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I checked with the Digitized Sky Survey, first survey, and the "star"
> > > doesn't show up on that image. My guess is it's not a real object.
> > >
> > >
> > > Wouter van Reeven
> > >
> > >
> > > > (fwd) Strange Star Near M51
> > > >
> > > > From: Lenny Abbey <labbey@mindspring.com>
> > > > Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 03:30:50 -0400
> > > >
> > > > I am appending a message from my local club email list. Does anyone have
> > > > any suggestions as to what might be going on?
> > > >
> > > > Lenny
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > > Lenny Abbey
> > > > Atlanta, Georgia
> > > > 404-634-1222
> > > >
> > > > Last Friday at Villa Rica I decided to try my luck at photographing
> > > > m51. I was able to get two exposures--the first was 30 minutes, the
> > > > second was 45. After I got them developed I scanned them into
> > > > Photoshop for some editing. As I was stacking the images, I noticed
> > > > something very peculiar. In the second exposure there is a star
> > > > missing! Thinking that this might not have been a real star (maybe
> > > > the result of bad development) I checked some other images of this
> > > > field and found that it is in fact a real star. So my question is,
> > > > what could have happened to the second exposure to make this star
> > > > disappear? Here is a link to the two images for comparison:
> > > >
> > > > http://personal.atl.bellsouth.net/~dabar/m51.htm
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
> > > > David Barmore
> > > >
> > > > PS...I'll also post the composite image to the files section. Please
> > > > let me know what you think. This was only my third roll of prime
> > > > focus DSO's. Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > | Alone in the clouds all blue... |
> > > | |
> > > | Wouter 'Teus' van Reeven |
> > > | Reeven@Strw.LeidenUniv.Nl |
> > > | http://vsnet.strw.leidenuniv.nl/~reeven/ |
> > > | telephone : 071 - (527) 58 13 |
> > > | icq 34696027 |
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> | Alone in the clouds all blue... |
> | |
> | Wouter 'Teus' van Reeven |
> | Reeven@Strw.LeidenUniv.Nl |
> | http://vsnet.strw.leidenuniv.nl/~reeven/ |
> | telephone : 071 - (527) 58 13 |
> | icq 34696027 |
>
>
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp