[vsnet-chat 4259] Re: re vs-chat 4203 [was GK Per etc.]

["Stan Walker" <astroman@voyager.co.nz>]

Hi John,

Didn't mean to offend. Your comments make the whole episode more
inexplicable to an outsider - like I said, the books attracted a number of
people to VS astronomy so why prejudice a reputation by inventing measures?

Regards,
Stan


----- Original Message -----
From: John Isles <jisles@voyager.net>
To: Stan Walker <astroman@voyager.co.nz>; no name <crawl@zoom.co.uk>;
<vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 9:02 AM
Subject: [vsnet-chat 4244] Re: re vs-chat 4203 [was GK Per etc.]


> Stan,
>
> I was asked a question, and replied to it.  Don't blame me if you didn't
> like the answer.  I don't wish to speculate about the motives of people
who
> fabricate observations, but you can rest assured that in this particular
> case the evidence was overwhelming, and convinced the Council of the BAA.
>
> Best wishes -- John Isles
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stan Walker" <astroman@voyager.co.nz>
> To: "John Isles" <jisles@voyager.net>; "no name" <crawl@zoom.co.uk>;
> <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 3:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [vsnet-chat 4227] Re: re vs-chat 4203 [was GK Per etc.]
>
>
> > Good Heavens, or something like that - what is VSChat coming to?
> >
> > I've always had mixed feelings about the Glasby events - what were the
> > motives?....
>
>

VSNET Home Page

Return to Daisaku Nogami

---

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp