[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 4227] Re: re vs-chat 4203 [was GK Per etc.]
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:59:42 -0400
- To: <crawl@zoom.co.uk>, <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "John Isles" <jisles@voyager.net>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 4227] Re: re vs-chat 4203 [was GK Per etc.]
- References: <3.0.6.32.20010417161206.00796680@pop3.zoom.co.uk>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
John Greaves wrote:
> In the late sixites / early seventies one John Glasby was the head of the
> BAA VSS....
> Unfortunately, it turned out that most of his observations were spurious.
> Later investigation proved that, for example, observations of SS Cyg would
> be logged when said was below the horizon. This was apparently eventually
> revealed by a BAA member and is covered in an article in the JBAA, but
> unfortunately I forget the reference. [If somebody out there who knows
> more about this could give some better details I feel it would be
> informative and of interest. With care the points can be made without
> making it personal, and they are important points. Is John Isles still
out
> there in vsnet-chat land, and do you know anything more concrete on this
> topic? This is in _no way_ an insinuation that Mr Isles was in any way
> involved in this matter, it's just that he was a lot closer to this event
> and organisation in time and space than I am/was, and has a good general
> knowledge of the amateur variable star obs field].
Yes, John Isles is alive and well out there in vsnet-chat land, and as
Glasby's successor in charge of the BAA Variable Star Section I was the
person mainly responsible for the repudiation of Glasby's work by the BAA,
and for doing the best I could to put things in order afterwards. I don't
know if Glasby is still alive, so I shall simply direct you to the published
references which were approved by the lawyers and which are:
Journal of the BAA, 86 (4) 262, 1976 June: notice repudiating many of
Glasby's section reports.
Journal of the BAA, 86 (4) 335, 1976 June: letter signed by the President
concerning "errors" in Glasby's book "The Dwarf Novae"
> Anyway, the point is, what does one do with archival observations by
> Glasby? He can't have invented all his observations. So, do you pick and
> choose or just bin the lot? And how do you discuss the topic without
> mentioning the person themself? In fact, what did/does the BAA VSS do
with
> these observations?
In Glasby's case, once we realised what was going on, we disregarded the
lot. They may remain in the archives on paper, but I hope none are in the
database.
Best wishes -- John Isles
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp