[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 4057] Visual Magnitude Estimates
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 05:12:17 +0800
- To: "vsnet-chat" <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "Andrew Pearce" <arpearce@ozemail.com.au>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 4057] Visual Magnitude Estimates
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Further to Seabastian's original enquiry, I thought I would outline my observing
methodology. Being primarily a visual comet observer (variables take more of a
priority when there are not many comets around!), I like to make magnitude
estimates by defocusing stars that are bright enough in the 16" reflector.
Typically this limit is around 12th magnitude. All variables brighter than
this, I use this method. Generally if there is any colour, which normally is
only in Miras or SR stars anyway (which I don't observe much), by defocusing,
this tends to reduce the effect and then you can either use direct or averted
vision without a great deal of difference.
Fainter than this, I find it easier to observe and make magnitude estimates
using averted vision. I just find it easy with my eyes, I must admit to not
having thought much about its relative value. However there is a degree of
consistency there.
As an aside, I must admit, that I have been interested in the discussion about
whether visual observers can report magnitudes to greater than 0.1 mag accuracy.
I generally find that for many variables, the comparison star magnitudes are
either not that internally consistent between themselves in the same sequence or
there is not a good spread of them to be confident of a greater accuracy.
Regards
Andrew Pearce
W.Australia
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp