[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 3887] Re: [vsnet-id 325] Info on a LMC star
- Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 13:08:37 -0700 (MST)
- To: varsao@fullzero.com.ar
- From: Brian Skiff <bas@lowell.edu>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 3887] Re: [vsnet-id 325] Info on a LMC star
- Cc: aavso-discussion@physics.mcmaster.ca, vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, vsnet-id@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
It is very helpful in such cases to look at a picture rather than
trying to parse out what's going on from catalogues alone. Try using thhe
Goddard SkyView utility:
http://skyview.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/skvadvanced.pl
o key in the coordinates
o click on "Digitized Sky Survey" in the next set of windows
o under "optional parameters", toggle "Grid" to 'yes'; change the image
size (degrees) to 0.1
o submit the request
...this will bring up a new window with (in this case) a short-exposure
image of the relevant region. As you can see from comparing coordinates
with the grid, the Tycho-1 detection is bogus, and Tycho-2 is correct,
and yes, it's a double star. The Tycho-2 photometry is probably simply
wrong. Any star with photometric uncertainty > 0.05 mag. (on either color)
in Tycho-2 should be treated as an approximate value. In this case, the
uncertainty is +/- 0.173 on VT. Remember also that these errors are
_underestimated_ by half according to the people who built the catalogue.
\Brian
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp