[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 3761] Re: [AAVSO-DIS] Duration of eclipses
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 06:43:27 GMT
- To: Sebasti若n Otero <varsao@fullzero.com.ar>
- From: Fraser Farrell <fraser@trilobytes.com.au>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 3761] Re: [AAVSO-DIS] Duration of eclipses
- CC: <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, AAVSO DISCUSSION<aavso-discussion@informer2.cis.McMaster.CA>
- In-Reply-To: <004701c04b96$332f7660$8f6dfea9@s8y0g5>
- References: <004701c04b96$332f7660$8f6dfea9@s8y0g5>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
> IS IT POSSIBLE THAT A SECONDARY ECLIPSE (I mean a "brighter" eclipse)
LASTS
> LONGER THAN A PRIMARY??
Sebastian,
I can imagine two ways to make this happen.
1) The orbit is elliptical. In fact, the primary and
secondary eclipses are of equal duration only for two
special cases:
- circular orbit, or
- if the major axis is in the plane of the sky
Separation of the eclipses by 0.5 of the period only
occurs for:
- circular orbit, or
- major axis parallel to our line of sight.
One lightcurve could be explained by many different
combinations of orbital parameters; so additional
evidence (eg: orbital velocities) would be needed to
pick the right numbers.
2) Either or both components change size for some
reason eg: one is a cepheid. It is likely that in this
case the system will show variation in addition to
eclipses (eg: AR Pav).
And yes, I will be staying up late tonight to confirm
(or disprove) the 27-day hypothesis for delta Vel.
cheers,
Fraser Farrell
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp